My T-37 carries one 44lb Rigid SuperMax
with 200 feet of 3/8 inch BBB chain as primary and one 45lb CQR with 60 feet of
5/16 inch Hi-Strength chain on 200 feet of Pelican Double Braid line as
secondary. Both are carried on bronze rollers mounted near the end of the
bowsprit. A 35lb Danforth with twenty feet of 5/16th-inch
Hi-Strength chain on 150 feet of 5/8th-inch three-strand line is
carried on the stern. Stowed below is a 70lb breakdown Fisherman Storm anchor
on 20 feet of 3/8th-inch BBB chain. Additional lines stowed
below are two 300-foot sections of 5/8 inch three-strand with spliced thimbles
at all ends.
All three anchors, but especially the
SuperMax, set very well in the thick mud and clay bottoms found throughout the
With the anchor rollers mounted near
the end of the bowsprit I haven't had a problem with either bobstay or whisker
stay interference. The downside to such a mounting is, of course, greater force
applied to the end of the bowsprit. Because of this, unless the forecast is for
absolute calm, I bridle the anchor chain with approximately forty feet of 3/4
inch three-strand that has been middled with a
thimble spliced in, which is chain-hooked to the chain (and moused on), the two
legs of which are led through the forward chocks and secured to the forward
deck cleats and then the Samson Posts. This slacks the chain to the bowsprit
and relieves the load on the windlass. The anchor bridle also includes two 3/4
inch rubber 'snubbers' for shock absorption.
The windlass, a Simpson-Lawrence
manual, is mounted astride the bowsprit just forward of the inner forestay, and
has a chain gypsy to starboard for the primary, a rope gypsy to port for the
secondary (the chain for the secondary comes aboard the old-fashioned way ...
hand-over-hand). Both chain and rope
leads are very fair to the windlass with only the forward roller.
If anyone has found a way to keep the
anchor chain away from the bobstay when wind and current conspire to do otherwise,
I will be an avid listener.
As for the inevitable and constant
changes to a boat's inventory, friends that have been cruising the Caribbean
for four years in their T-37 swear by a 65lb CQR and it is on my list ...
probably replacing the SuperMax for eventual off shore cruising. One reason for
replacing it is the difficulty of stowing it securely and I have had to
affix stainless striker plates on the bowsprit to prevent damage as it is
brought up on the rollers. Also, on two occasions offshore in heavy weather,
wave action has dislodged the SuperMax allowing the shank to ride on the
whisker stay. The 'peening' effect has required the starboard whisker stay to
be twice replaced.
As far as performance, with the CQR
well set in a clay-mud bottom in the St. Mary's River and all 200 feet of chain
out in 20 feet of water, we experienced a tornadic front passage with sustained
winds of 70+ knots for approximately twenty minutes and all that happened to
the anchor was that it just buried itself deeper. The initial heeling response
to the winds brought the spreaders within ten feet of the water and everything
on deck that wasn't secured cascaded overboard ... including the windlass
handle. That's how I know how well the anchor was buried.
Gray Creager S/V
aerandir
May 2000
______________________________________________________________________________
The folks on
the "rec.boats.cruising" newgroup are getting together for their second bulk
purchase of SPADE anchors (super rated by Prac
Sailor) from the French Company who manufacturers them in
Rich Hampel April 2002
______________________________________________________________________________
I had the chain stacking problem until I switched from 3/8th proof to 5/16th high test. It seems to flake down much better and is smaller. When I have a lot of chain out (150 feet or more), I ensure that the chain in the anchor locker is ready to accept a big pile (the rest is flaked around where the big pile will fall). I only have 180 feet of chain. If you have more than 200 feet of chain, the problem may not be fixable. The anchor locker is just not big enough.
Concerning the washdown system, I teed-in both fresh and salt water and have used nothing but fresh over the last 20,000 miles. The anchor chain life is greatly extended plus the decks are washed better and actually dry compared to salt water (ever see them magically become wet again from salt water at dusk as the humidity rises?). The bilges are never subjected to salt water and its corrosive effects. Even hosing off a completely muddied chain and anchor every two or three days, I manage 2 weeks between water fill-ups. Of course, doing this really depends on your cruising grounds...
______________________________________________________________________________
Roger,
Check my windless setup in the photos on the FTP site: ftp://ftp.tognews.com/ , then
V-42_CC_Restless/Simpson
I use a 45 # Super Max with 5/16th high tensile chain. I
like it much better than my old Tayana-supplied CQR knock-off. Your Grand Deer
windlass is a Simpson Lawrence 555 knock-off. A SL gypsy will fit it if you
decide to change chain size. The SS post is standard on all of them. Rubbing on
the SS plate forward of the bow locker is normal. I believe that is the only
reason the plate is there. I drop my anchor from the cockpit using the electric
windlass without opening up the bow locker. It always seems to amaze other
skippers as the chain runs neatly right out of the deck....
_____________________________________________________________________________
Roger,
I've got a T37 with the original GD windlass. From what I've read, they used the same windlass on the V42. When I bought the boat, the existing 3/8PC chain didn't fit the gypsy properly, either. I took the gypsy down to the chandlery and tried all the chain buckets to see what fit best. The answer was 5/16HT. I replaced my chain and all is well now; the windlass works perfectly. Somebody else on this site came up with a remarkably low price of around $1.80 per foot for 5/16HT, far less than I paid. I think the article with their source was printed in the last TOG issue.
I've got a 60# Bruce anchor. Kamaloha had the original 45# CQR when I bought it, but I've always had trouble trying to get a CQR to set properly in hard coral sand. The Bruce is like glue and has been far easier to set, in my opinion.
I figure someday I'll upgrade to an electric windlass too, but it is down on the list.
Charlie T-37 Kamaloha Nov 2002
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ray,
I've used the 45# SuperMax from
southern
Additional info added May 2005: I have since anchored in the
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ray,
One thing I forgot to mention about the
45# SuperMax is that it is not easy to stow on the bow rollers of a
V-42. It's bottom is very narrow as compared to the
wide, flat bottom of my CQR. The SuperMax tends to wobble from side-to-side
when stowed and must be braced or have a SS pin run through it to stabilize it.
I drilled a hole in the stock and used a pin (the manufacturer said no
problem). The flukes are also close to the cove stripe at the bow (like an inch
away) and I have really banged up the fiberglass when releasing/stowing the anchor.
It might be OK on a T-37. Don't know which Tayana you have.
_____________________________________________________________________________
I have a T37 and I have wondered
about stowing the MAX. I was reading about it on their web site and they say
that "Max anchors have recently been improved. They now have a shank that
allows more depth when resting on a bow roller and which has caused the fluke
to be further away from the stem of the boat." I wonder if you have one of
these? They don't say when the new version was
"launched" but it sounds like it might fit the Tayana 37 better than
the older model. I am also wondering how it compares to the Delta 44 in it's shanks size since I made my bow roller to fit a
delta. Thanks for the info.
Ray Slaninka
Red Bank,
NJ
Nov 2002
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ray,
Got my anchor in 1996 or 97 so it is
probably the older, shorter type. At least they recognized the problem.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Creative Max (SuperMax) website
www.creativemarine.com
I found them using the Google search engine.
Ray
Slaninka
Red Bank,
NJ
Nov 2002
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ray,
What I have to report is *W*O*W* does
the spade set well. I have the 44# steel version. I had stupidly anchored in a tidal bore
inside
The spade needs only about 5:1 scope
to set whereas my CQR needed 7-10 scope just to set. Do I like my spade anchor? .... a definite YES. It has even set in loose shells (where my
CQR has failed miserably). I typically anchor on marl bottom, mud, grass, sand,
shells etc. I haven’t had any use in rocky bottoms. So far, its one of the best
setting anchors I’ve ever had. It resets quickly, fairly easy to break loose.
I've already sold my main CQR and have another 25# CQR
lunch hook for sale. Since the
You'll have to contact Glen direct - I think his website is www.rutuonline.com
Regards, Rich
Hampel January 2003
_____________________________________________________________________________
Glen has established a small business for
distributing the Spade Anchors. He apparently now routinely imports them. His
web site is http://www.spade-anchor-us.com/index.html
Price for a 44-pound (not including
shipping?) is $555.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Harvey,
Rich:
Thanks guys. I realized after sending the
email that Glenn sells them. I emailed him about it and he responded quickly
even though it was Sunday. Here's his response to my question about the
44# Spade vs. the 44# Delta on a 24,000lb boat:
BEGIN
The S100 is roughly equal to the
Delta 44. It will have a higher average holding power than the Delta but Spade
rates their anchors very conservatively. With your dry weight of 24000 lb. you
are getting close to the upper end of the recommended range for the S100. I
would be inclined to recommend the 66 lb. S140 or the 33 lb. A140. Either would
put your boat at the low end of the range for either anchor and give you a
large safety margin. In this particular case, I think the aluminum A140 would
be the best choice. It has the same holding power as the steel model but is a
lot easier to handle and will put less mass out on the bow. (It is also a heck of
a lot easier to get back on board when the windlass craps out.) The heavier
S140 will set slightly faster in harder bottoms but in my experiments comparing
S100s and A100s, the difference is hard to notice.
Keep in mind that the weights are
"nominal". The principle behind Spade's holding power is geometry,
not weight. The fluke and shank are a matched set. Each anchor is assembled and
individually balanced at a specific angle by casting lead into the tip. The
weight may vary as much as 2 or 3 pounds.
I do have both an S140 and an A140 in
stock. The S140 sells for $845 and the A140 is $880. Shipping would be $44 for
the S140 and $32 for the A140.
END
Rich, what do think of Glenn's
response regarding sizing the anchor? I wonder how conservative is the rating
on Spades?
Rich, I too just sold my 45# CQR. I
am selling my 44# Delta too. Anybody want it? Although I really like the Delta,
I decided I would sleep better with a 55# Delta and then maybe a Spade or Super
Max as a second anchor. I'm not crazy about the Delta or any plow in soft mud,
but for everything else it is a great anchor for the money.
I suspect you were anchored off the
Coast Guard station in
Regards, Ray Slaninka S/V Lorna
Doone
January 2003
_____________________________________________________________________________
Charlie,
I recall that Walter Bruj had suggested Certex as an inexpensive source of chain. They have an outlet in Santa Fe Springs, near Los Angeles. They quoted a price of $1.69 a foot for ACCO brand 5/16" HT. That is considerably less expensive than West Marine or Boat US for the exact same item.
_____________________________________________________________________________
John:
I have 5/16" HT 225'. It is a good compromise between weight and strength. But remember that what holds your boat at anchor is the WEIGHT of the chain, not the strength. So, some people recommend carrying the heaviest chain you can. 3/8" or bigger is better in that regard. If I didn't have a bow fuel tank I might have considered 3/8" chain but if your windlass craps out it would be a bear to weigh! Many people, even with larger boats carry 5/16 HT (grade4). But I remember reading a story about a man who weathered a huge storm in Chile and he felt that the only reason his boat survived at anchor was because he had 1/2" chain down. That's a lot of weight.
Another consideration is "where are your cruising grounds"? For sailing the Pacific, you'll want more chain than say in the Caribbean. So more chain, more weight, bigger chain, even more weight. Three years ago when I bought my chain, I paid $975 for a full drum, 550', from Tanton Yachts. 10% over cost plus shipping. I split it with a friend. I kept 300'. 225 for the main anchor and 75' for the secondary anchor. However I might change the secondary length to 20' and the rest 5/8" nylon 3 strand so I can use the capstan on the winch for most of the haul when I use 2 anchors. I assume your windlass has a gypsy on one side and a capstan on the other like mine. Also, don't forget to get a good snubber. I like the snubber/hook that http://www.bestmarineimports.com/ sells better than the ABI plate. I own both.
Good Luck Ray Slaninka February 2003
_____________________________________________________________________________
Regarding the weight of chain issue: Anyone here use an anchor sentinel? That is supposed to increase the effectiveness of the anchor by holding the chain down while not being as heavy as a larger chain. After all, it's not really the WEIGHT of the chain as much as the ANGLE OF INCIDENCE of the chain pulling on the anchor, is it? Or do I misunderstand the issue?
Charlie s/v Kamaloha February 2003
____________________________________________________________________________
Safety at Sea Committee of the Sailing
Foundation conducted anchor tests on five selected sites around
http://www.vicmaui.org/2000/resource_center_article_safety_anchor_study.htm#Performance%2035%20and%20Fortress%2037
Bill
McMullen November 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
My two cents:
I own a T48 and have considerable experience with anchoring all types of boats
with a variety of anchors. I anchor in mud and sand/kelp mostly.
The best 'all purpose' primary anchor IMO -- and the one I use -- is the Bugel
anchor.
http://bestmarineimports.com/ssteelanchors.html
I did head to head tests with CQR in mud spinning the boat at mid RPM 180
degrees. Bugel held perfectly whereas the CQR did not. The Bugel anchor has
fantastic burying characteristics (long sharp flat fluke, sharp shank,
concentrated weight at fluke end, etc.).
On mud bottoms with reversing currents I would often always have problems (real
or imaginary:-) using Danforth/Fortress, Plows and
Bruce type anchors whereas the Bugel gave a solid set with superb holding
power.
The primary anchor should be 'all purpose'. I use Fortress anchors as
secondary.
The Bugel is very expensive (in polished stainless) and should come with the Wasi swivel joint. But for the insurance and comfort of a
good night's sleep I don't think you can beat it.
BTW, I've anchored with Delta plows well over 100 times and don't recommend
them. You need lots of patience to allow the anchor to slowly set. Backing down
too hard on plows will not set the anchor in soft surface bottoms.
Recommend snubbing up at 2:1 scope (drifting back) and waiting 30 minutes after
full scope is deployed before checking with throttle.
Two anchors off the same rode (Fortress 25-30' ahead of Bugel) linked by chain
is an awesome combination for high holding in inclement weather.
BTW, Practical Sailor was unable to get a hold of a Bugel for their head to
head anchor tests...too bad.
=====
Be jolly,
Arnstein Mustad
Master &
US Sailing Passage Making Instructor
Melges 24
USA 352 & Tayana 48, s/v Jolly
Tar November 2004
Encinal
Yacht Club / Club Nautique
Founder
of "San Francisco Sailing Yahoo Group" (est. 1999), click here
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sanfranciscosailing/
Jolly Tar Racing Team web site (invite required): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jolly_Tar/
_____________________________________________________________________________
Well, my 44# Bruce held Kamaloha through 120kt winds and the direction flip as the eye of Ivan passed overhead, as many other boats dragged and beached. The bottom was volcanic sand / silt / thin grass, and the anchor was thoroughly buried and visually inspected. I've never tried to anchor in rock or seaweed, and mud per se is hard to find in the Caribbean, too. I was on a 10:1 scope of 5/16 HT with a nylon-bridled snubber.
I've never dragged the Bruce. I have
dragged the CQR which preceded it several times. I've also been known to use a
Danforth in grassy conditions.
HTH,Charlie
s/v Kamaloha, T37
#542 November 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
John – I sometimes had the same problem with my ABI chain grabber. I had to make sure I kept adequate tension on the snubber lines to make sure it didn’t fall off as I started to lower the anchor. I concluded it was caused by not having enough tension on the grabber and/or not having the two snubber lines length equally set to the cleats. I ended up purchasing a Devils Claw chain grabber. That solved any issue with the grabber coming off while either lowering or at anchor. As a mater of fact, the claw will stay on the chain without any pressure at all. I’ll usually keep the claw just below the surface in calm conditions and have two 30 foot lines spliced to it so I can easily let out more line and chain if conditions get worse. One of the other benefits I discovered is that I could offset the snubber lines to keep the chain from strumming against the bobstay. I purchased the Devils Claw through Best Marine at a cost of $65.00. Their website is www.bestmarineimports.com
Dennis November 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
Jeff, we use a 55# Delta Fast Set after years of multiple sets with the 45 CQR. We like the Fast Set much better. It sets on the first try every time. Also the thin shank presents no problem for the roller guide......
Joe Ghiotti & Terri
Leone S/V Gale Rider V42-CC
HN
091
December 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
Well, 5/16 HT held Kamaloha through Ivan. Locals in the bay tell me the winds were 125kts just before the eye passed. So I think it is plenty strong... and you can easily fit 300' in half the available locker space (I keep 50' chain plus 300' rode in the port half, 275' chain in the stbd half. Being in the Caribbean I only anchor with all chain unless I HAVE to set the second hook. Much safer with all of the coral about.)
HTH , Charlie December 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
Your V-42 must have a different bow roller setup than ours. We carry a 45# CQR and a 20kg Bruce together just fine.
Harry & Melinda Schell S/V Sea Schell December 2004
_____________________________________________________________________________
Has anyone found a long lasting way to mark anchor chain? Previous owner used nylon ties every twenty feet. 1 for 20, 2 for 40 etc. Over time, the ties would break when going through the windlass.
Has anyone found a more improved way to mark the rode? It's nice to have a fairly accurate idea of how much rode is in the water.
thanks, John Hovan s/v Celtic Dream www.TayanaOwners.org March 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Anchor Chain Marking
Just a data point, I'm working on installing a anchor rode counter for Sojourn that will count the anchor rode in feet as it spools out and hold the count on a low cost digital display in the pilot house. Everything on the bow is water tight, it's just a small magnet and a reed switch. It turns out it's about a foot around the outside of a Windlass Gypsy, as the magnet doesn't require any wiring it's attached to the drum, each time it goes by the reed switch it's a contact to ground and the meter in the Pilot House counts 1 foot. it doesn't count up and down, you put out the required scope by the feet on the readout, when it's time to pull up, you note the feet hit reset button to zero the display and then it will count the feet as the anchor comes up. I had this one installed on my last boat and it's pretty cool, you know how far down you are, you know when your off the bottom and you know how far the anchor is from the boat when coming up. Oh, by the way, it's less then 40 bucks for everything, it's uses so little current it's not a factor, the hard part is building your own housing for the display... I think they cost a few hundred bucks to buy an anchor counter but their way over engineered with all kinds of bells and more information than you really need. If anybody wants one, I'll see if I can did out the info on where to get the parts.
___________________________________________________________________________
I saw at the Newport boat show 2
years in a row one of the windlass suppliers tooled up plastic clips that
clipped on to chain. They would withstand trips through the wildcat without
damage. They came is colors and are specific to the chain size. Since I have
not purchased chain yet, I did not bother to keep track of who it was. I am
sure if you searched the windlass suppliers you would find them.
Andy
March 2005
____________________________________________________________________________
Hi Nick,
Wonderful idea.
It will also help oil the teak decks with an SAE 140
gear oil. I always liked the idea of having black decks in the semi-tropics.
My main anchor is a
45# CQR. At present it only has about 60 feet of 3/8" chain,
with about 120-140' of nylon (?1/2" or 5/8"
- I have notes on it somewhere around here, but can't recall at the moment). I
plan to change that setup to 300' of 5/16" HT when we cruise up north,
with about 200' nylon. When down here in Southern California, I'll probably go
with about only 80" of 5/16". We found that many of the anchorages in
Alaska and B.C. were easily 10-15 fathoms (60-90') and chain makes life a lot
easier, if you have an electric windlass. We have a Lofrans Tigres 1200, and
really like it. Much better than our old manual SL 555,
and infinitely better than all those years of a
Our stern anchor is a Fortress FX23
with 15' of HT (3/8") and 140' of Ankarolina dacron strapping on a spool. Our secondary sits
securely in our garage. It's a 35 pound Stainless Danforth. I have not yet
decided on the rigging for it as a secondary bow anchor, but it will probably
be about 60' chain, and 200' nylon. I have mainly used a CQR when sailing on
various borrowed/chartered/swapped boats in the
Harvey
Karten
April 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Looking at mounting a
Delta 55 Quickset on a new roller over the rail between the Sprit and the
whisker stay. It looks like it will clear everything a drop down without
a problem as will a second anchor on the port side. I have a Maxwell 1200 for
the Delta as a main anchor and if I install a block attachment about a foot
behind the Sprit I should be able to attach a block and use the Windless to
pull up the second anchor on a rope rode. The specs on the Delta 55 calls for a
3/8 chain but I just put in 300 feet of 5/16 BBB. I know the windless has the
power but what is the big deal with 3/8 or 5/16 as chain size..
The Delta 55 is two over size but I would need to go to a 35lb to get to the
recommended 5\16 chain ????
Bill
May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi
Bill,
Since a windlass must have a gypsy sized
for either BBB or Hi-tensile chain as well as chain
size, you just need to match the chain to the windlass.
The following chain specs apply:
5/16th BBB has a working load of 1950# and weighs 110#/100 feet
5/16th
High Tensile has a working load of 3900 and weighs 115#/100 feet
3/8th
BBB has a working load of 2650 and weighs 164#/100 feet
5/16th Hi-tensile has a price similar to 3/8th BBB
While 3/8th chain is heavy and tends
to put excess weight in the bow, it also means less swing compared to lighter
chain and requires a little less scope due to its high weight.
I have had 3/8th BBB but switched to
5/16th Hi-tensile when changing windlasses. I needed the extra strength since
my boat is heavier and sails to the anchor rather severely.
Wayne
V-42 C/C
RESTLESS May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi Wayne,
Does a stabilizing (anchoring) sail on the V-42 reduce the sailing at anchor?
______________________________________________________________________________
I tried
rigging my storm jib on the backstay years ago and it worked fairly well but
the sail was too big. It also had too much draft. I never used it again. A
friend of mine with an O'Day 40 recently bought the
Boat U.S. riding sail and said that it worked extremely well while on a
mooring. So well that other boaters riding out the same storm contacted him on
the radio to ask how he kept his boat so steady. It’s not that they didn't see
the riding sail. They just couldn't believe that the small, flat sail was
responsible for his boat lying "rock steady".
Wayne
V-42 C/C
RESTLESS
May 2005
(Update: August 2005 – Moored in Newport Harbour in a blow with his riding sail up, a harbor craft pulled alongside and advised my friend that using a stern anchor in a mooring field was unwise. My friend pointed astern at the riding sail and said, “Don’t have one out…”)
______________________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Anchor chain
I'm a big fan of dropping a smaller anchor off the stern
with enough scope to let the boat swing some. It does reduce the sailing to the
anchor issue but for my money, more importantly, if the wind comes up in the
night the old boat will start a-rolling and wake me up to see what's going on.
I feel that the weight of the chain is a lot more important
than it's strength, (but I could easily be wrong :-) )
making sure that the anchor is dragged horizontally instead of at an angle
helps it keep set.
When cruising I had 150 feet of 3/8 chain on our 32 footer
on a Bruce 33 plus 300 feet of 1" nylon and we only dragged once.
Also these days you usually don't have the option of setting
a "correct" scope since there are so many boats around.
Bill
Jaine
May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi
Bill,
I agree with your ideas on anchoring although I have rarely used a stern anchor. As a single hander, it is sometimes hard to get out. If the anchorage has a swell that must be countered by reorienting the boat, it does work well and is really the only option. But for high winds, I usually set a second anchor using my dinghy. I keep 19# aluminum Viking (the forerunner of a Fortress 37) on the port bow roller with 15 feet of chain and lots of 3/4 inch nylon rode.
I believe that my boat didn't swing as much when I used 3/8th chain. I really miss that stability sometimes when I lower my 5/16th rode. Your 32-footer must have been very steady at anchor. As far as knowing when the wind pipes up, I use the wind alarm on my sailing instruments every time I anchor. I have remoted a buzzer to my bed. I have lived aboard so long that I sleep too well at anchor and need help to monitor the weather. Even on a calm night, I set the alarm for 8 knots. The reason: if I expect calm winds all night, then I want to see what is going on when the wind comes up unexpectedly. In the Caribbean, I noted that there always seemed to be a slight wind increase prior to each rain shower. The wind alarm was 90% effective in getting me up to close the hatches.
Wayne V-42 C/C
RESTLESS May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
Sailrite (www.sailrite.com) makes a nice anchoring sail kit. They have a useful description of the construction of the kit (http://sailrite.com/PDF/AnchorRiding%20LG.pdf), and a very informative note at the end by Jim Grant, on optimal setting of the anchor sail. He raises a very interesting point of information - the anchoring sail should be set off to the windward side to further reducing 'hunting'. Sailrite offers two sizes of Anchor riding sails, a 12 square foot and a 25 square foot. The 12 sq. foot is suggested for boats up to 35', and the 20 square foot for up to ca. 50'. They suggest mounting it on a backstay and tying the forward end to a toe rail. The photo in their catalogue shows it mounted about 8' above the deck. (http://sailrite.com/PDF/SailCat0405.pdf - see page #21 of the catalogue). Price for the Sailrite kit for the larger boat is $105. They state that it can be assembled on a regular home sewing machine in a single evening.
regards,
______________________________________________________________________________
I use a 25 sq. ft. riding sail, raised on the backstay, positioned higher than the boom and led to a winch at the base of the mast - boat sits like a duck on a frozen millpond. Takes about a minute to raise and set ... I fly my ensign from a 'looped' cleat on the backstay and simply lower the ensign and raise the riding sail.
Rich
Hampel
May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
I have a Stack-Pack sail collector for my
mainsail. When tight it provides a lot of sail area and serves as a pretty
decent riding sail. That together with ALWAYS using a nylon
bridle on my anchor chain and we don't sail the anchor very much at all.
HTH, Charlie s/v
Kamaloha
May 2005
______________________________________________________________________________
For my 10 cents,
you don't have ground tackle sized for average weather, you have it sized for
the worst hurricane that you will NEVER encounter.
Our 32 foot boat
has a Bruce 33, 150 feet of 3/8 BBB chain and (I think) 300 feet of 1"
nylon. Plus 4 other anchors/chain/rode. I have had it
all out on one occasion....we didn't move, unlike every other boat around us.
BUT the 1" rode was stretched so tight that it was just over 1/2 "
thick!
I also don't think
it's about the "strength" of the "system" but the
"weight" of it. I wouldn't go for lighter ht chain but for heavier,
going to stay on the sand, chain. It's about
catenary and keeping the anchor pulling flat through the ground.
Try reading Bob
Griffith's book, Bluewater, its old (1979) but they
sailed their 54 foot boat in some rough water and have lotsa
good advice.
Bill & Sue T37 TYA3725707
______________________________________________________________________________
There’s a
good web page that talks about all this and INCLUDES a downloadable spreadsheet
to calculate loads, catenary, etc. http://www.johnsboatstuff.com/Articles/anchor.htm
Also, with an all
chain rode, the author supports
Tad McDonald
March 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
Nice find Tad,
Have you
followed the discussions over the years about using two anchors in series on
the main anchoring system. I think the idea is to minimize
the surge/grab on the main anchor?
Bill & Sue Jaine T37
TYA3725707 Wave Dancer Port Hope
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi Rich,
If the sine
is 1, i.e. the initial segment of the chain is almost straight vertical, and
you are in 40 feet of water, the weight of that first 40 feet of chain is
approximately 44 pounds, using 5/16" HT chain (1.1 pounds/foot). A 10 or
15 pound kellet may not make that much difference, would it? As you are blown
back on your chain, more will lift and the angle will decrease, as will the
sine.
How much weight
should be in the kellet to produce a significant benefit.
(Using weight of boat as 25,000 pounds, depth 50 feet, tide 20 feet, 5/16"
HT chain at 1.1 pounds, 45 pound anchor, assume zero current. But can you
generate a family of curves for varying wind speeds. Assume an anchor and
bottom capable of holding up to direct 500 pound loading along the horizontal.)
How much additional force is required to place loading directly on the anchor
with different kellet weights? The concept of the benefits of
a kellet are very appealing, but how heavy does it have to be in order
to make a difference?
______________________________________________________________________________
Jim,
Traveler has 200' of 3/8 galvanized
chain which fits easily into the starboard section of our divided anchor
locker. Attached to it is a 45lb CQR. WE had to replace the original ground
tackle and opted to upgrade from a 35lb to a 45 lb. Although 35lb is supposedly
adequate for boats up to 40', when you look at the weight limitations, a loaded
T37 is pushing the limits. Our other anchor is a Fortress 37, again, oversized
for our boat according to length, but in a bad blow, you need more, not less.
It is attached to 100' of 3 strand 1/2"
nylon with 40" of 3/8 galvanized chain at the end to assure the anchor
remains dug in and lays flat. We mostly use the CQR on chain, an easy habit to
get into with a Lighthouse electric winch.
Sandra Blake T37 Traveler
______________________________________________________________________________
Good morning
Steve Abel March 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi
Harvey,
I found that spray paint didn't last long, even though it was easy to apply.
I started using brush-on enamel (bought at the hardware store) with a pattern
that seems to work at night fairly well. I painted the chain with a 3 to
4-foot long yellow section every 50 feet, then put one then two 9" white
stripes in the middle of it at the 100 and 200 foot marks (with just yellow at
the intervening 50-foot marks). Starting about 10 feet from the end, I
painted it all yellow with white stripes. (we have
250' of chain). I found that painting it, letting it dry for a couple hours,
then turning it over and painting again worked OK - I let it dry overnight on the
dock before cranking it back aboard. Yes, the newspaper you put under
will adhere to it, but that comes off the first time you use it :-)
I had previously tried red paint, but that was invisible at night.. yellow isn't easy to see at
night vs the galvanize color (without a light), but the white stripes jump up
at you against the yellow.
I figure the extra labor involved in painting with a brush was worth it
as the effort to flake it all out on the dock was much more work!
Hartley S/V Atsa March 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
I’ve used
every method you’ve covered. I don’t like the paint (I used some sort of
manly, high optic, orange stuff). It wore off and it’s worthless at night
unless you’ve got artificial light available.
I like the plastic thingys for rope…not chain.
I like the cable
ties for chain; tactile at night, colored for day.
Since the water
here on the
- 25,50,75 are each ONE GREEN.
- 100 is TWO RED (if I’m in that deep, I want to be
cautious).
- 125, 150, 175 are each ONE RED.
- 200 is TWO GREEN (indicates that if I’m not careful,
I’ll lose a lot of money).
- 225, 250 are each ONE GREEN.
Etc.
It
makes it easy to instruct the crew: “Let out 2 green.” Or “Let out two thingys.”
Also, my bridle
coincidently is just the correct length that if I stop chain deployment when
the marker hits the gypsy, adding the bridle and lowering the chain to remove
the strain places the marker at the surface of the water. I ain’t that smart. I just noticed it one day.
Tad McDonald
March 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
Hi Harvey,
For marking
chain, I use the 1" nylon webbing used for holding up a bimini, etc. You
don't have to remove the chain to install it, just ease it out and sew it on
the link. I use a Sharpey to mark the footage. Now even the greenest crewmember
can go to the bow and report the amount of chain deployed. As long as the chain
is never taken off the gypsy, the webbing remains up on the top of the link and
never wears. I use two at thirty, one at fifty, and then alternate. I use about
a 6" strip of webbing but you can use more with no problem. You can color
them with a Sharpey to help determine the footage from the cockpit or even skip
a link or two to change the "code".
As a singlehander,
my current webbing has worked perfectly for 15 years and 25,000 miles of
cruising and still shows no wear. It is easily seen from the cockpit (I use a
remote windlass control). I do have to remark with the Sharpey occasionally and
ensure to wash them off when retrieving the anchor in mud.
______________________________________________________________________________
We use the fluorescent
colored wire ties. 1 yellow @ 25', 2@50' 3@75', 1 red @ 100', 1 red & 1
yellow @ 125', etc. The fluorescent colors show pretty well, they're cheap and
easy to replace when broken. They usually stay on for a while even when broken.
They last 2-3 years in our experience.
Harry & Melinda Schell Sea
Schell 1981 V-42 CC #41 March 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
Many thanks to all who provided suggestions about marking the
anchor chain. I ended using my own modification of a system with spray
paint.
I decided that I
didn't need markers any closer than 33.3 feet intervals (= to approximately 10
meters or slightly more than 5.5 fathoms).
First 10 feet = 10 feet of yellow
33.3 feet Red-White-Red (ca. 7"-8" of each
color for total of about 24")
66.6 feet Red-Blue-Red
100 feet Red-Red-Red
133 feet White-Red-White
166 feet White-Blue-White
200 feet White-White-White
233 feet Blue-Red-Blue
266 feet Blue-White-Blue
300 feet Blue-Blue-Blue
301-315 feet = all yellow.
All marks beginning and ending in Red are up to 100 feet.
All marks beginning and ending in White are between
133 and 200 feet.
All marks beginning and ending in Blue area between
233 and 300 feet.
Interval marks at 33 foot increments are sufficient
for me. My rationale was that along the Pacific and in the Northwest, we
usually anchor in relatively deep water, and the fewer the number of color
bands, the easier to remember. I am a devout member of the Cult of KISS. I was
even thinking of only putting on marks every 100 feet, but then thought I might
get bored just watching the anchor disappear into the water, so more frequent
markings might keep me awake.
The all yellow at
the beginning provides an indicator as to when the anchor will emerge from
under water. The yellow at the end provides warning that I am reaching the
bitter end.
My intent was to
keep it simple enough that I could remember it when exhausted after a long day
sailing in crummy weather, or when resetting a
dragging anchor in the middle of the night.
The basic color combo is Red-White-Blue.
A lot simpler than my initial thought of going with
ROYGBIV. Besides, I don't think I could read the difference between Blue,
Indigo and Violet on a dark rainy night.
I used Rustoleum
fluorescent paints, when available.
I'll let you all
know if these paints hold up under anchoring conditions.
regards,
______________________________________________________________________________
There's no
originality here, as I shamelessly copied the above-referenced "anchor
Angel" or "anchor friend", but I' thought I'd list the various
components that I used to construct this home-made kellet. FWIW, it looks like
this will work very well, and is definitely a good alternative to a $250
product, or rocks in a bucket.
I opted to go a bit
heavy, as I am motivated to protect my T-48 as best as I can. I'm sure the main
weight, and hence the other items, could be downsized somewhat, but I felt it
was false economy to skimp here. As it was, I'm in this for only about $65.
Ingredients:
- A 35 lb free-weight (from a sporting goods store)
- 5' of 5/16 chain (I used galvanized BBB, from a
local home-store)
- 3' of 1.5" ID reinforced water hose (from the
same store)
- 3 each 1/4" galvanized shackles
- 50' of 3/8" nylon as the control-line
The free weight is
cast steel, so I liberally coated it with Rustoleum. Yes, it will still rust,
and yes, plastic-coated would be better, but this is what I had to work with.
Additionally, I couldn't find a plastic-coated weight greater than 25 lbs. YMMV
OK, run one end of
the chain through the center of the weight. Shackle this end back onto the
chain, forming a captured-loop (IOW, capture the weight in the loop of chain
you just formed). Use as short a length of chain as you can for this.
Next, slide the
hose over the +- 3' of chain remaining. Again, shackle the end of the chain
(the other end this time) to itself, roughly where you attached the first end.
At this point, you have
a figure 8...the bottom half is the weight, and the top half is the
chain-in-the-hose, which has been looped to form a circle.
The basic kellet is
now done. Time to connect the control-line. For this,
I cut a 1.5" x .5" rectangle out of the reinforced hose. This hole is
located at the apex of the hose-loop, on the outside bend. The purpose for this
is twofold. Primarily, it allows you to work the 3rd shackle onto the chain
inside the hose, so you can tie the control line to this new lifting point (I used
a bowline for this).
2nd, it allows air, and thus unwanted flotation, to
escape the hose once submerged.
That's about it.
Everything stores in a space equal to the footprint of the weight, and can be
stored below until needed.
HIH, John April 2006
______________________________________________________________________________
Catenary:
There is an even
more in-depth analysis of catenary and case studies of rope, rope and chain,
and all-chain here: http://alain.fraysse.free.fr/sail/rode/forces/forces.htm
Even this is
actually a touch incomplete and doesn't consider several important scenarios
but the general conclusion, which is that mostly chain with a nylon snubber is
best, is more or less accurate and is commensurate with our experience.
Kellets:
Kellets do make
the chain harder to pull straight, so keeping the angle of pull on the anchor
closer to the ideal of horizontal, but they suffer from a logical catch-22.
Conditions strong enough to drag a decent anchor are likely to straighten the
chain, with the kellet making practically no difference, so the kellet is next
to useless in the very conditions that you care about - and only really does
its thing in light conditions when a higher pull angle isn't going to be an
issue anyway.
The upshot of
this is that kellets are useful if you want to reduce your swing radius in a
tight anchorage or similar, but do not I repeat do not increase
the ultimate holding power of the anchor. If it drags at 1 ton force without a
kellet, then it will probably drag at 1 ton force with a kellet (do the math
and figure out how much difference, in terms of degrees, an average kellet
might make with that kind of force).
Kellets can also
be a pig to deploy and retrieve. The nuisance may be enough to really
discourage their use. A good design is made here in
Suggestion:
maybe the weight (and cost) of the kellet is better put into a heavier and
hence larger and hence better performing anchor? But then I'm just a biased party who wants
everyone to buy bigger and more expensive anchors.
Craig Smith Rocna Anchors www.rocna.com April
2006
______________________________________________________________________________